文章摘要
潘 越,贾淑娴,陈翔梧,张诗迎,郝国祥,马青坪,宋永朝,吴一波.循证科普:如何保证健康科普创作的科学性[J].科普研究,2019,14(5):102~107
循证科普:如何保证健康科普创作的科学性
Evidence-based Health Popularization:How to Ensure the ScientificNature of Health Popularization Creation
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 循证 健康 科普创作
英文关键词: evidence-based health popularization  health popularization  evidence-based medicine  health popularization creation
基金项目:
作者单位
潘 越 山东大学药学院 
贾淑娴 山东大学口腔医学院 
陈翔梧 山东大学药学院 
张诗迎 山东大学药学院 
郝国祥 山东大学药学院 
马青坪 山东大学药学院 
宋永朝 河北医科大学第一医院药学部 
吴一波 北京大学药学院药事管理与临床药学系 
摘要点击次数: 1525
全文下载次数: 689
中文摘要:
      随着循证医学的发展,循证思维逐渐被应用到越来越多的领域。为了提高健康科普的科学性,本文从 循证思维出发,提出应用循证的理念进行健康科普创作,并在循证视角下提出当前健康科普在证据选择、评价 及应用方面存在的问题:证据选择偏倚、核心观点缺乏高级别证据支持、未选用最新证据、将争议内容当做学 术界共识、选用无可靠证据来源支持的专家意见、证据与文章主题或结论相关性差、文章与大众需求或健康素 养不符等。为解决这些问题,在健康科普创作中,我们应当应用循证科普,合理使用检索词和数据库进行最新、 有效证据的搜集,并对证据进行评价筛选,最后结合大众需求和健康素养进行证据的应用。
英文摘要:
      With the development of evidence-based medicine,evidence-based thinking has gradually been applied to more fields. In order to improve the scientific nature of health popularization,this paper proposes the use of evidence-based thinking to create health popularization,and puts forward the following scientific problems of health popularization in the selection,evaluation and application of evidence under the evidence-based perspective:bias in the choice of evidence,the lack of high- confidence-level evidence to support core views,no selection of the latest evidence,the use of controversial content as academic consensus,the selection of expert opinions that are not supported by reliable sources of evidence,the evidence of poorly related to the subject and conclusion of the article, and articles of no matching the needs of the public or health literacy. Therefore,in the creation of health popularization,the author suggested applying evidence-based health popularization,rationally use search terms and databases to collect the latest and effective evidence,evaluate and filtrate the evidence,and finally according to public demand and health literacy to use evidence.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

分享按钮