公共突发事件的科学辟谣机制比较研究

A Comparative Study on Typical Refutation Mechanisms for Scienceand Technology Related Rumors for Emergency Management

中文关键词: 科学谣言 辟谣机制 协同共治 公众参与

英文关键词: rumor related to science and technology  rumor refutation mechanism  collaborative governance  public participation

中文摘要:

      在公共突发事件中，网络科学谣言危害社会稳定和公共利益，在应急科普中构建科学辟谣机制是应 对网络科学谣言的重要手段。目前科学辟谣机制包括政府自主型、媒体主导型、公众参与型和多方联合型四 种，对这四种辟谣机制的优劣势进行分析，有助于构建更为有效的谣言治理体系。研究表明，加强对网络科 学谣言的治理，需要整合不同辟谣平台，构建谣言治理共同体，综合发挥四类辟谣机制的各自优势。各级政 府应将辟谣工作纳入舆情管理体系，加强政府主导的联合辟谣机制建设，推动公众有序参与辟谣。

英文摘要:

      In public emergencies， rumor related to science and technologyon the internet damage social stability and shared interests. Scientific rumor refutation is a key method to deal with it. The traditional anti-rumor mechanism mainly includes four types such as government-leading，media-leading， public participation and multi-agent collaboration. Analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the above mechanism in rumor refutation will help to build a more effective rumor governance system. To strengthen the governance of the rumors related to science and technology，we need to integrate different anti-rumor organizations，build a rumor governance community，and take advantage of the four types of rumor suppression mechanisms. Governments at all levels should incorporate the anti-rumor job into the public opinion management work system，strengthen the construction of joint anti-rumor mechanism led by the government，and create an accessible way for public participation.