我国馆校合作政策的历史演进、变迁逻辑与未来展望

The Historical Evolution，Changing Logic，and Future Prospects of Museum-School Collaboration Policies in China

中文关键词: 馆校合作 馆校结合 历史制度主义 政策划分 变迁逻辑

英文关键词: museum-school collaboration  museum-school combination  historical institutionalism  policy phases  change logic

中文摘要:

      馆校合作政策的发展对于落实教育、科技、人才“三位一体”战略具有重要意义，但目前学术界 对于馆校合作政策变迁的理论关怀有限。本研究采用历史制度主义的视角，对近20年馆校合作政策的历史 演进进行梳理，从结构逻辑、历史逻辑和动力逻辑对其变迁逻辑进行分析，并提出未来展望和优化路向。 研究结果表明，我国馆校合作的政策演进可以划分为素质教育改革背景下的铺垫起步阶段、未成年人科学 素质发展背景下的联结探索阶段、育人方式变革下的深化提质阶段以及“双减”浪潮下的统筹体系化阶段， 其变迁受宏观情境、路径依赖与关键历史节点、微观行动者之间的互动与博弈的影响，未来，需要洞悉社 会深层结构，构建政策变迁的动态调整机制；巩固积极路径依赖，构建政策集群的整体推进机制；调适多 元利益主体，构建政策执行的协同联动机制。

英文摘要:

      The development of museum-school collaboration policy holds significant importance in advancing the national strategy of integrating education，science，and talent development. However， there is currently limited theoretical focus within academia on the policy evolution associated with museum-school collaboration. This study adopts a historical institutionalism perspective to examine the historical evolution of museum-school collaboration policies over the past two decades. It analyzes the logic of policy changes from structural，historical，and dynamic dimensions and proposes future outlooks and optimization strategies. The results reveal that the evolution of museum-school collaboration policy in China can be divided into four phases: the foundational phase under the backdrop of quality education reform，the exploratory phase of connection driven by the development of minors’ scientific literacy，the deepening and quality-enhancement phase under the transformation of educational approaches，and the systemic integration phase under the“double reduction”policy wave. The policy changes are influenced by macro contexts，path dependence，and critical historical junctures，as well as the interactions and dynamics among micro-level actors. Looking forward，it is essential to： （1）gain insights into deeper societal structures and establish a dynamic adjustment mechanism for policy changes；（2）consolidate positive path dependencies and develop a comprehensive advancement mechanism for policy clusters；and（3） reconcile the interests of diverse stakeholders and create a collaborative and synergistic mechanism for policy implementation.